Can Republicans Warm Up to a Carbon Tax?
01/18/2013 by James Handley
Can Republicans Warm Up to a Carbon Tax? (Nat’l Journal)
01/18/2013 by James Handley
Can Republicans Warm Up to a Carbon Tax? (Nat’l Journal)
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
CBO Report: Carbon Tax Would Generate Revenue, Avert ‘Catastrophic’ Effects (The Hill)
U.S. Methane Emissions Outstrip Estimates (Science Daily)
Australia Carbon Tax Already Cutting CO2 (The Age)
Study: 97% of Peer-Reviewed Articles Attribute Climate Change to Human Action (Reuters)
RGGI Falls Far Short of Effective Carbon Pricing (Sieren Ernst, Energy Collective)
For Insurers, No Doubts on Climate Change (NYT, Economic Scene)
Congress: Tax Carbon Pollution (Concord Monitor, LTE)
Oregon Legislature Studying Carbon Tax (Portland Business Journal)
Atmosphere’s CO2 Burden Reaches 3,000,000-Year High (NYT)
Could Mark Sanford Lead Republicans Out of Climate-Denial Wilderness? (Bill Becker, Climate Progress)
Carbon Tax is Best Option Congress Has (Washington Post Editorial)
Report To Ways & Means Suggests Carbon Tax (Platts)
Carbon tax backers quietly forge ahead in D.C. (The Hill)
Carbon Tax — Making Polluters Pay (G. Wagner, Energy Collective)
The Cost of Doing Nothing (Sarah Kellogg, Washington Lawyer)
Impacts of Australia’s Carbon Price, 9 Months In (Mondaq Blog)
Friedman Suggests 25% of Carbon Tax To Fund Energy Innovation (Energy Trends)

Watch the 30-minute highlight video
See presentations (video and PPT) by Hansen, McKibben, Ackerman, Barnes, DeChristopher, Reps. Larson, McDermott, Inglis, and others.
Carbon Tax Center
11 Hanover Square, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10005
(212) 260-5237
Contact Us
info@carbontax.org
Support the Carbon Tax Center. Our Contact page has instructions for making contributions.
Excellent article! If conservatives and liberals can agree on the need for a carbon tax, that is a major first step.
Now, I hope the liberals can show some flexibility in recognizing that the proceeds should go to people, companies and local governments that have been directly or indirectly affected by climate-change events, or those that need funds to protect against likely future events, rather than being diverted for other things (recognizing that this dedicated funding leaves more general revenues available for other things).
And I hope conservatives can show some flexibility in allowing the funds to pay not only for direct impacts of climate change, but also indirect impacts of mining coal, drilling for oil and fracking for gas.
Establish a carbon repair fund, and let people, companies and local governments draw from it whenever necessary, and adjust the carbon tax rate accordingly. This will set our energy policy and economics on the right path.
Comment by Jay Tyson — January 19, 2013 @ 2:11 pm