<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAQs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carbontax.org/faq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carbontax.org</link>
	<description>Pricing carbon efficiently and equitably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Little Fearmongering &#171; thk127</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-282518</link>
		<dc:creator>A Little Fearmongering &#171; thk127</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/faq/#comment-282518</guid>
		<description>[...] dioxide &#8212; the primary greenhouse gas &#8212; is imperative to reduce global warming.” [more] As a living human that is a burden to the earth through the natural process of breathing, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dioxide &#8212; the primary greenhouse gas &#8212; is imperative to reduce global warming.” [more] As a living human that is a burden to the earth through the natural process of breathing, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arctic sea ice &#171; carbonlessair</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-261559</link>
		<dc:creator>Arctic sea ice &#171; carbonlessair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/faq/#comment-261559</guid>
		<description>[...] A carbon tax would encourage energy efficiency while generating revenue to develop and implement alternative energy and energy efficiency. http://www.carbontax.org/faq/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A carbon tax would encourage energy efficiency while generating revenue to develop and implement alternative energy and energy efficiency. <a href="http://www.carbontax.org/faq/" rel="nofollow">http://www.carbontax.org/faq/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Arctic Ocean &#171; carbonlessair</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-252796</link>
		<dc:creator>The Arctic Ocean &#171; carbonlessair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 01:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/faq/#comment-252796</guid>
		<description>[...] A carbon tax would encourage energy efficiency while generating revenue to develop and implement alternative energy resources. http://www.carbontax.org/faq/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A carbon tax would encourage energy efficiency while generating revenue to develop and implement alternative energy resources. <a href="http://www.carbontax.org/faq/" rel="nofollow">http://www.carbontax.org/faq/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I pay, you pay, we all pay for ice-cre… no, wait, CARBON! &#171; Sci/craft: science communication</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-216446</link>
		<dc:creator>I pay, you pay, we all pay for ice-cre… no, wait, CARBON! &#171; Sci/craft: science communication</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/faq/#comment-216446</guid>
		<description>[...] Proponents suggest a universal carbon tax – energy providers are taxed on the basis of their particular fuel’s environmental damage potential. This means the dirtier the energy, the more they pay. This tax is passed, eventually, through to consumers; however, everyday people get a refund from the government (of this tax), and the government actually keeps very little. What it eventually means is that dirty energy producers pay most, and the wealthiest people pay most because they use the most energy/applicances/flights/consumables and so on. The Carbon Tax Centre, advocating for this stance, has a good set of FAQs that clears up many questions (http://www.carbontax.org/faq/). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Proponents suggest a universal carbon tax – energy providers are taxed on the basis of their particular fuel’s environmental damage potential. This means the dirtier the energy, the more they pay. This tax is passed, eventually, through to consumers; however, everyday people get a refund from the government (of this tax), and the government actually keeps very little. What it eventually means is that dirty energy producers pay most, and the wealthiest people pay most because they use the most energy/applicances/flights/consumables and so on. The Carbon Tax Centre, advocating for this stance, has a good set of FAQs that clears up many questions (<a href="http://www.carbontax.org/faq/" rel="nofollow">http://www.carbontax.org/faq/</a>). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Williams and Allan Zabel and the &#8220;Huge Mistake&#8221; Video: Can We Please Talk About the Issues They Raise? &#171; Environmental Law &#38; Climate Change Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-136409</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Williams and Allan Zabel and the &#8220;Huge Mistake&#8221; Video: Can We Please Talk About the Issues They Raise? &#171; Environmental Law &#38; Climate Change Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/faq/#comment-136409</guid>
		<description>[...] taxes should be phased in so businesses and households have time to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] taxes should be phased in so businesses and households have time to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British Columbia Introduces a Carbon Tax &#171; The Olive Ridley Crawl</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-17248</link>
		<dc:creator>British Columbia Introduces a Carbon Tax &#171; The Olive Ridley Crawl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/faq/#comment-17248</guid>
		<description>[...] carbon tax advocacy center sets the required starter tax as 10c a gallon, BTW, so this measure by BC is no joke, it&#8217;s a serious effort to rein in CO2 emissions from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] carbon tax advocacy center sets the required starter tax as 10c a gallon, BTW, so this measure by BC is no joke, it&#8217;s a serious effort to rein in CO2 emissions from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

