<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carbon Tax Center &#187; Governmental Bodies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/category/governmental-bodies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carbontax.org</link>
	<description>Pricing carbon efficiently and equitably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:05:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Energy Secretary Steven Chu lost his battle with Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/02/how-energy-secretary-steven-chu-lost-his-battle-with-washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/02/how-energy-secretary-steven-chu-lost-his-battle-with-washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did you know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governmental Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Energy Secretary Steven Chu lost his battle with Washington (TNR)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How Energy Secretary Steven Chu lost his battle with Washington (<a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/magazine/100037/steven-chu-energy-obama-solyndra?page=0,0&amp;passthru=YjIwOWMwNWJkNDM5MDhmZjdkODM4MDUxMDRjNDllYjg">TNR</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/02/how-energy-secretary-steven-chu-lost-his-battle-with-washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds: Marcellus Shale Gas = 6 Years of U.S. Demand, Not 17</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/29/feds-marcellus-shale-gas-6-years-of-u-s-demand-not-17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/29/feds-marcellus-shale-gas-6-years-of-u-s-demand-not-17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Governmental Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feds: Marcellus Shale Gas = 6 Years of U.S. Demand, Not 17 (NYT)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feds: Marcellus Shale Gas = 6 Years of U.S. Demand, Not 17 (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/29/us/new-data-not-so-sunny-on-us-natural-gas-supply.html">NYT</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/29/feds-marcellus-shale-gas-6-years-of-u-s-demand-not-17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corruption, Mistrust Prop Up Gasoline Subsidies</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/17/corruption-mistrust-prop-up-gasoline-subsidies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/17/corruption-mistrust-prop-up-gasoline-subsidies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Governmental Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corruption, Mistrust Prop Up Gasoline Subsidies (NYT)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corruption, Mistrust Prop Up Gasoline Subsidies (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/world/africa/nigerian-president-rolls-back-price-of-gasoline.html">NYT</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/17/corruption-mistrust-prop-up-gasoline-subsidies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Euro Court of Justice Upholds EU Fee on Airline CO2</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/12/21/euro-court-of-justice-upholds-eu-fee-on-airline-co2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/12/21/euro-court-of-justice-upholds-eu-fee-on-airline-co2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Governmental Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Euro Court of Justice Upholds EU Fee on Airline CO2 (NYT)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Euro Court of Justice Upholds EU Fee on Airline CO2 (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/22/business/global/court-upholds-europes-plan-to-charge-airlines-for-carbon-emissions.html">NYT</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/12/21/euro-court-of-justice-upholds-eu-fee-on-airline-co2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada Leaving Kyoto Protocol</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/12/12/canada-leaving-kyoto-protocol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/12/12/canada-leaving-kyoto-protocol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cap-and-Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governmental Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada Leaving Kyoto Protocol (NYT)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada Leaving Kyoto Protocol (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/13/science/earth/canada-leaving-kyoto-protocol-on-climate-change.html">NYT</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/12/12/canada-leaving-kyoto-protocol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crunch Time Coming for U.K. Carbon Commitment</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/28/crunch-time-coming-for-u-k-carbon-commitment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/28/crunch-time-coming-for-u-k-carbon-commitment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governmental Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crunch Time Coming for U.K. Carbon Commitment (NYT)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crunch Time Coming for U.K. Carbon Commitment (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/28/business/global/28iht-RBOG-BRITAIN28.html">NYT</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/28/crunch-time-coming-for-u-k-carbon-commitment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kyoto Plus 14 (Years): A Telling Graphic on Compliance or Violation</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/28/kyoto-plus-14-years-a-telling-graphic-on-compliance-or-violation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/28/kyoto-plus-14-years-a-telling-graphic-on-compliance-or-violation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Governmental Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kyoto Plus 14 (Years): A Telling Graphic on Compliance or Violation (WaPo)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyoto Plus 14 (Years): A Telling Graphic on Compliance or Violation (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/exceeding-goals-and-falling-short/2011/11/27/gIQAHR5l2N_graphic.html">WaPo</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/28/kyoto-plus-14-years-a-telling-graphic-on-compliance-or-violation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate to vote on blocking EPA pollution rule</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/09/senate-to-vote-on-blocking-epa-pollution-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/09/senate-to-vote-on-blocking-epa-pollution-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 03:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Handley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Governmental Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky) Seeks To Block EPA Cross-State Pollution Rule (Atlanta JC)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky) Seeks To Block EPA Cross-State Pollution Rule (<a title="The latest congressional salvo against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will come in a Senate vote Thursday to block a regulation on coal-fired power plants that is vigorously opposed by the Southern Co. and other utilities." href="http://www.ajc.com/business/senate-to-vote-on-1221338.html">Atlanta JC</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/09/senate-to-vote-on-blocking-epa-pollution-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama proposes CO2 regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/09/obama-proposes-co2-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/09/obama-proposes-co2-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Handley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Governmental Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EPA Proposes CO2 Regulations for Power Plants (LA Times)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EPA Proposes CO2 Regulations for Power Plants (<a title="The Obama Administration announced Tuesday its intention to regulate CO2 emissions from power plants for the first time. The new rule, nimbly titled “Greenhouse Gas New Source Performance Standard for Electric Utility Steam Generating Units,” would allow the Environmental Protection Agency to create emissions standards for new power plants." href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2011/11/obama-proposes-co2-regulations.html">LA Times</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/11/09/obama-proposes-co2-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green groups give EPA more time on CO2 rule</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/10/30/green-groups-give-epa-more-time-on-co2-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/10/30/green-groups-give-epa-more-time-on-co2-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Handley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Governmental Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Environmental Defense Delays Suing EPA For Overdue Power Plant CO2 Rule (Reuters)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Environmental Defense Delays Suing EPA For Overdue Power Plant CO2 Rule (<a title="&quot;Green groups said on Saturday they would give the Environmental Protection Agency more time to forge the first-ever plan to regulate carbon dioxide from power plants, the country's single biggest source of greenhouse gases.&quot;" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/29/us-usa-epa-carbon-idUSTRE79S2IO20111029">Reuters</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/10/30/green-groups-give-epa-more-time-on-co2-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

