<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carbon Tax Center &#187; Did you know?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/category/did-you-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carbontax.org</link>
	<description>Pricing carbon efficiently and equitably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:05:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/06/8953/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/06/8953/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did you know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Study: Media Drive Climate Concern; Gore Didn&#8217;t Polarize Warming (Think Progress)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Study: Media Drive Climate Concern; Gore Didn&#8217;t Polarize Warming (<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/02/06/419371/study-debunks-al-gore-polarized-the-debate-myths-of-public-opinion-climate-change/">Think Progress</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/06/8953/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobelists Molina and Richter Respond to WSJ Physicists</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/03/nobelists-molina-and-richter-respond-to-wsj-physicists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/03/nobelists-molina-and-richter-respond-to-wsj-physicists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did you know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobelists Molina and Richter Respond to WSJ Physicists (Dot Earth)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobelists Molina and Richter Respond to WSJ Physicists (<a href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/02/two-nobelists-offer-views-of-human-driven-global-warming/">Dot Earth</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/03/nobelists-molina-and-richter-respond-to-wsj-physicists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CA, NY, WA Will Require Insurers to Disclose Climate Exposure</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/03/ca-ny-wa-will-require-insurers-to-disclose-climate-exposure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/03/ca-ny-wa-will-require-insurers-to-disclose-climate-exposure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did you know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CA, NY, WA Will Require Insurers to Disclose Climate Exposure (NYT)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CA, NY, WA Will Require Insurers to Disclose Climate Exposure (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/02/business/energy-environment/three-states-tell-insurers-to-disclose-responses-to-climate-change.html">NYT</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/03/ca-ny-wa-will-require-insurers-to-disclose-climate-exposure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Energy Secretary Steven Chu lost his battle with Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/02/how-energy-secretary-steven-chu-lost-his-battle-with-washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/02/how-energy-secretary-steven-chu-lost-his-battle-with-washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did you know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governmental Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Energy Secretary Steven Chu lost his battle with Washington (TNR)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How Energy Secretary Steven Chu lost his battle with Washington (<a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/magazine/100037/steven-chu-energy-obama-solyndra?page=0,0&amp;passthru=YjIwOWMwNWJkNDM5MDhmZjdkODM4MDUxMDRjNDllYjg">TNR</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/02/02/how-energy-secretary-steven-chu-lost-his-battle-with-washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;End of America&#8217;s Coal Era&#8221; in Sight</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/30/end-of-americas-coal-era-in-sight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/30/end-of-americas-coal-era-in-sight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did you know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krazy Karbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;End of America&#8217;s Coal Era&#8221; in Sight (Economist)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;End of America&#8217;s Coal Era&#8221; in Sight (<a href="http://www.economist.com/node/21543563">Economist</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/30/end-of-americas-coal-era-in-sight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top energy-efficiency group wants U.S. to consider carbon tax</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/23/top-energy-efficiency-group-wants-u-s-to-consider-carbon-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/23/top-energy-efficiency-group-wants-u-s-to-consider-carbon-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Did you know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prices Matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top energy-efficiency group wants U.S. to consider carbon tax (ACEEE statement)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top energy-efficiency group wants U.S. to consider carbon tax (<a href="http://aceee.org/white-paper/should-us-consider-modest-emissions-fee">ACEEE statement</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/23/top-energy-efficiency-group-wants-u-s-to-consider-carbon-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governments Spend $1.4 Billion Per Day to Destabilize Climate</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/19/governments-spend-1-4-billion-per-day-to-destabilize-climate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/19/governments-spend-1-4-billion-per-day-to-destabilize-climate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Handley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did you know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prices Matter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gov&#8217;ts Spend $1.4 Billion/Day Subsidizing Fossil Fuels (Earth Policy Inst.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov&#8217;ts Spend $1.4 Billion/Day Subsidizing Fossil Fuels (<a title="We distort reality when we omit the health and environmental costs associated with burning fossil fuels from their prices. When governments actually subsidize their use, they take the distortion even further. Worldwide, direct fossil fuel subsidies added up to roughly $500 billion in 2010. Of this, supports on the production side totaled some $100 billion. Supports for consumption exceeded $400 billion, with $193 billion for oil, $91 billion for natural gas, $3 billion for coal, and $122 billion spent subsidizing the use of fossil fuel-generated electricity. All together, governments are shelling out nearly $1.4 billion per day to further destabilize the earth’s climate." href="Governments Spend $1.4 Billion Per Day to Destabilize Climate">Earth Policy Inst.</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/19/governments-spend-1-4-billion-per-day-to-destabilize-climate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists: Go for Low-Hanging Fruit with Co-Benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/17/scientists-go-for-low-hanging-fruit-with-co-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/17/scientists-go-for-low-hanging-fruit-with-co-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did you know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists: Go for Low-Hanging Fruit with Co-Benefits (NYT)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists: Go for Low-Hanging Fruit with Co-Benefits (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/countering-climate-change-without-waiting-for-a-payoff.html">NYT</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/17/scientists-go-for-low-hanging-fruit-with-co-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 11 Coal Plant Polluters for 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/14/top-11-coal-plant-polluters-for-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/14/top-11-coal-plant-polluters-for-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Handley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did you know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EPA Reveals Top 11 Coal Plant CO2 Polluters (NWF)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EPA Reveals Top 11 Coal Plant CO2 Polluters (<a href="http://blog.nwf.org/?p=41557&amp;preview=true">NWF</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2012/01/14/top-11-coal-plant-polluters-for-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Isn’t There a More Massive, Activist Climate Movement?</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/12/29/why-isn%e2%80%99t-there-a-more-massive-activist-climate-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/12/29/why-isn%e2%80%99t-there-a-more-massive-activist-climate-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Komanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did you know?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/?p=8868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Isn’t There a More Massive, Activist Climate Movement? (Ted Glick &#8211; Grist)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why Isn’t There a More Massive,  Activist Climate Movement? (<a href="http://bit.ly/w0PTmv">Ted Glick &#8211; Grist</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2011/12/29/why-isn%e2%80%99t-there-a-more-massive-activist-climate-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

