Editorial: Tax Carbon to Slow Climate Change
11/14/2011 by Charles Komanoff
Editorial: Tax Carbon to Slow Climate Change (Concord [NH] Monitor)
Latest News
U.S. Methane Emissions Outstrip Estimates (Science Daily)
Australia Carbon Tax Already Cutting CO2 (The Age)
Study: 97% of Peer-Reviewed Articles Attribute Climate Change to Human Action (Reuters)
RGGI Falls Far Short of Effective Carbon Pricing (Sieren Ernst, Energy Collective)
For Insurers, No Doubts on Climate Change (NYT, Economic Scene)
Congress: Tax Carbon Pollution (Concord Monitor, LTE)
Read these first
Daily Email Updates
Latest News, continued
Oregon Legislature Studying Carbon Tax (Portland Business Journal)
Atmosphere’s CO2 Burden Reaches 3,000,000-Year High (NYT)
Could Mark Sanford Lead Republicans Out of Climate-Denial Wilderness? (Bill Becker, Climate Progress)
Carbon Tax is Best Option Congress Has (Washington Post Editorial)
Report To Ways & Means Suggests Carbon Tax (Platts)
Carbon tax backers quietly forge ahead in D.C. (The Hill)
Carbon Tax — Making Polluters Pay (G. Wagner, Energy Collective)
The Cost of Doing Nothing (Sarah Kellogg, Washington Lawyer)
Impacts of Australia’s Carbon Price, 9 Months In (Mondaq Blog)
Friedman Suggests 25% of Carbon Tax To Fund Energy Innovation (Energy Trends)
EU ETS Will Require Emissions to Rise (Power Engineering)
Should Carbon Tax Replace EU’s Cap & Trade? (Brad Plumer, WaPo)
Blog Archives
Categories
- Blogroll
- Briefly Noted
- Budget
- Cap-and-Trade
- Carbon Tax
- Did you know?
- Editorial
- Equity
- Governmental Bodies
- Graphs
- International
- Krazy Karbon
- Media
- News
- Newsletter
- Offsets
- Politics
- Prices Matter
- Science
- Technology
Monthy Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Video and PowerPoints are now available from
The Wesleyan Conference
November 2010
Watch the 30-minute highlight video
See presentations (video and PPT) by Hansen, McKibben, Ackerman, Barnes, DeChristopher, Reps. Larson, McDermott, Inglis, and others.
I concur that Now might be the perfect time to introduce an alternative vision of our energy future.
Comments at the Concord Monitor site are disappointing. Article misses the point of revenue being passed on as dividends to families; key to getting buy-in from the people.
Rebates to renewable energy users is good idea,. As is charging a tariff on imports. But using the revenue to pay off the deficit? Caused primarily by military expenses, unending wars, and bailouts to the large banks? How about using revenue to subsidize the wind & solar industries instead? Stark needs to refine this bill to get our support.
Comment by meenal — November 25, 2011 @ 9:17 am