Rep. Doggett on Waxman-Markey: “I Cannot Support It.”
06/26/2009 by Charles Komanoff
Following is the statement delivered by Rep. Lloyd Doggett during today’s House floor debate on the Waxman-Markey “American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009” (H.R. 2454, or “ACESA”). Rep. Doggett, a Democrat, has represented Texas’s 25th CD (central Texas, including Austin) since 1995, and is a senior member of the House Ways and Means Committee.
This energy bill’s fine print betrays its laudable purpose. The real cap is on the public interest and the trade is the billions from the public to polluters. It is too weak to greatly spur new technologies and green jobs. An Administration analysis shows that doing nothing actually results in more new renewable electricity generation capacity than approving this bill.
Vital authority for the EPA is stripped, but 2 billion additional tons of pollution are authorized every year, forever. Residential-consumer protection incredibly is entrusted to the mercy of utility companies. Exempting a hundred new coal plants and paying billions to Old King Coal leaves him, indeed, a very merry old soul.
This bill is 85% different from what President Obama proposed months ago. No wonder his Budget Director called this type of bill ‘the largest corporate welfare program in the history of the United States.’
Until greatly improved, until families share in the billions this bill grants powerful lobbies, I cannot support it.
(Click here to view a video of Rep. Doggett’s floor statement. Other CTC posts immediately prior to this present more detailed critiques of the Waxman-Markey bill.)
Photo: Flickr / jrwolivet.
Later, Congressman Doggett reversed himself. He now supports HR 2454 — because, he said, of the “inane arguments” coming from the “flat-earthers” across the aisle.
Comment by Chris Winter — June 26, 2009 @ 5:55 pm
The chances that Congressman Doggett read this monstrosity with its elephantine 300-page 3 AM add-ons seem slim. Satellite data indicates 10 years of global cooling accompanying increased CO2 emmissions, little of which increase is US caused. The “FLAT-EARTHER” is you, Congressman-you don’t believe in your own satellites. You are far worse than inane, and you will be defeated by the Senate, if working AMERICANS CAN HAVE tHEIR WAY. WE NEED NUCLEAR POWER, ANTIMISSILE DEFENSE, AND USE OF US OIL and coal techno. You are hurting the people you claim to represent, especially the poor.
Comment by Terence Smith — June 26, 2009 @ 11:30 pm
If a camel is a horse designed by committee, this climate bill is like a bowline or square not designed by special interests and their lobbyist hacks — a gordian knot. It has been twisted and twined in every way imaginable to make it beautiful in the eyes of the special interests. As far as providing any nourishment for climate-ameliorative forces, it is at best a very thin gruel.
Let us hope that leadership will emerge, to cut the gordian knot with the carbon tax as Alexandrian sword.
Comment by David Collins — June 29, 2009 @ 3:07 pm
On July 1, the Washington Post published the following letter to the editor by Greg Ebel, President and CEO of Spectra Energy Corp., which operates natural gas pipelines and gas processing, storage and distribution facilities.
Comment by James Handley — July 2, 2009 @ 6:57 pm
Waxman’s & Markey’s Cap’n Trade bill was twisted, turned, condimented and roasted to appease representatives who had no interest in the purpose of the bill — mitigating Global Warming — let alone in the effectiveness of the bill.
Those aforementioned representatives are ignorant of more than climate science and economics. They are ignorant of pretty much everything except their personal careers and their egos. It is wise to consider the advice in the Good Book, specifically Matthew 7:6, “…neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.” The last two clauses are a pretty apt description of what those aforementioned representatives have been and are doing.
The swine belong in the pigpens, not in the halls of Congress.
Comment by David Ocampo — July 3, 2009 @ 7:44 pm
The editorial in THE STATE (July 6), “Inglis, Laffer: A plan conservatives could warm to” shows good thinking. The scary part is the line, “Conservatives do not have to agree that humans are causing climate change to recognize a sensible energy solution.” It is tragic that acknowledgment of anthropogenic global warming is a partisan issue, that your political views bespeak your science views, that science theories are “beliefs” on a par with the Confession of Augsburg.
Nevertheless, it is great to see it stated, plainly and clearly, that it is okay for Conservatives to support the Carbon Tax.
Comment by David Ocampo — July 6, 2009 @ 11:36 am
The one time famed tattoo artist, Don Ed Hardy, is today ed hardy t shirts a clothes artist branding a whole new world of pop culture art clothing retailed ed hardy UK through his shops located in his San Francisco ed hardy clothing studio. Hardy commercializes his ed hardy clothing pop culture art through various popular clothing brands. The public ed hardy UK appreciation of his art occasioned his appointment as a member of the San Francisco Cultural Arts Commission and also caused him to be a recipient of an honorary cheap ed hardy doctorate degree from the San Francisco Art Institute.
Ed Hardy’s clothing line of pop culture art is a major thematic ed hardy UK expression of coolness and informality as a remedy to a world gone mad with materialism, consumerism, temporariness, immorality and mental insanity. Hardy’s cheap ed hardy clothing art also clearly impresses an obligatory sense of the simplicity of life which was exactly what our ancestors ed hardy UK believed in and lived with in times past.
Hardy’s pop culture branded products is ed hardy t shirts manufactured by Ku USA, Inc. and retailed in the USA as well as overseas; these include: Waikiki, Dubai, Kuwait, Dallas, Los Angeles, Miami, Tuscon, New York, Houston, Tokyo, Singapore, Noosa, Melbourne, Sydney and Riga. The company plans ed hardy clothing to add New Delhi, Mumbai and Hamburg on its retail circuit. In 2004, Christian Audigier ed hardy t shirts purchased the license to manufacture and market Hardy’s ed hardy t shirts clothing brand of Von Dutch. However, Hardy’s pop culture brands of clothing have been banned by several night ed hardy clothing clubs in Vancouver because they associate this line of clothing with gang rivalries.
In 1982, Hardy and his wife diversified ed hardy clothes into the publication business while simultaneously ed hardy t shirts pursuing their literary talents by authoring and editing over twenty five books on ed hardy clothing alternative art. Additionally, Hardy organized various exhibitions ed hardy t shirts for galleries, museums, non-profit organizations and universities. Hardy and his ed hardy clothing artistic works have also featured in the film and print media.
Comment by Aligigelads — September 2, 2010 @ 9:36 pm