<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hansen Tells Ways &amp; Means:  Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax Needed to Spur Clean Technology Revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/</link>
	<description>Pricing carbon efficiently and equitably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:02:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Failed Economy &#124; WORKERS EDUCATION</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-162505</link>
		<dc:creator>A Failed Economy &#124; WORKERS EDUCATION</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/#comment-162505</guid>
		<description>[...] that would change this would be a huge increase in fossil fuel prices through the imposition of carbon taxes of one sort or another (perhaps with the dividends be redistributed to the population, as James [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that would change this would be a huge increase in fossil fuel prices through the imposition of carbon taxes of one sort or another (perhaps with the dividends be redistributed to the population, as James [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alert: Overhaul or Scrap ACESA (Waxman/Markey) Climate Bill &#124; Rising Tide North America</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-97310</link>
		<dc:creator>Alert: Overhaul or Scrap ACESA (Waxman/Markey) Climate Bill &#124; Rising Tide North America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/#comment-97310</guid>
		<description>[...] Congress should skip ACESA’s complexities and go back to the drawing board to develop a revenue-neutral carbon tax, managed price or cap-and-dividend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Congress should skip ACESA’s complexities and go back to the drawing board to develop a revenue-neutral carbon tax, managed price or cap-and-dividend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Action Alert: Overhaul or Scrap ACESA (Waxman/Markey) Climate Bill &#124; Mobilization for Climate Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-97305</link>
		<dc:creator>Action Alert: Overhaul or Scrap ACESA (Waxman/Markey) Climate Bill &#124; Mobilization for Climate Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/#comment-97305</guid>
		<description>[...] Congress should skip ACESA’s complexities and go back to the drawing board to develop a revenue-neutral carbon tax, managed price or cap-and-dividend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Congress should skip ACESA’s complexities and go back to the drawing board to develop a revenue-neutral carbon tax, managed price or cap-and-dividend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-53763</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/#comment-53763</guid>
		<description>Coal is now the cheapest &quot;source of fuel&quot; for our utilities. Coal mines employ 1000&#039;s of workers. How will this affect the coal producing states of the USA?Who will employ the &quot;coal miners&quot;?
  If someone can come up with a cheaper source of fuel,(than coal),&#160;for our utilities, have them, produce it now. Why delay?
  &#160;Nuclear would be the cheapest and best way for utilities to produce electricity. We need more safe nucleur plants to generate our energy needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coal is now the cheapest &quot;source of fuel&quot; for our utilities. Coal mines employ 1000&#8217;s of workers. How will this affect the coal producing states of the USA?Who will employ the &quot;coal miners&quot;?<br />
  If someone can come up with a cheaper source of fuel,(than coal),&nbsp;for our utilities, have them, produce it now. Why delay?<br />
  &nbsp;Nuclear would be the cheapest and best way for utilities to produce electricity. We need more safe nucleur plants to generate our energy needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcia West</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-53254</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcia West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/#comment-53254</guid>
		<description>This website needs adjustment... i forgot one of the required fields and when i hit the back button to fix it,&#160; my comment was gone. It was something like:
  Or the option to cash in, with tutorials on how investing brings money in when you are careful. The consumer culture has taught folks to how to secure credit card interest charges, not dividends from investments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This website needs adjustment&#8230; i forgot one of the required fields and when i hit the back button to fix it,&nbsp; my comment was gone. It was something like:<br />
  Or the option to cash in, with tutorials on how investing brings money in when you are careful. The consumer culture has taught folks to how to secure credit card interest charges, not dividends from investments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Handley</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-53095</link>
		<dc:creator>James Handley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/#comment-53095</guid>
		<description>Ken,
Intriguing idea: invest the dividend in renewable energy / clean tech and build our country&#039;s savings and clean energy infrastructure. It&#039;s a push/pull, too: A rising carbon price would make those investments increasingly profitable.&#160;
But some of us will be pinched by a rising carbon tax (or cap); we&#039;ll need the &quot;dividend&quot; right away.&#160;&#160; Maybe an option to cash out? (BTW, I&#039;ve invested my IRA in renewable energy technology via the &quot;New Alternatives Fund.&quot;) &#160;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,<br />
Intriguing idea: invest the dividend in renewable energy / clean tech and build our country&#8217;s savings and clean energy infrastructure. It&#8217;s a push/pull, too: A rising carbon price would make those investments increasingly profitable.&nbsp;<br />
But some of us will be pinched by a rising carbon tax (or cap); we&#8217;ll need the &quot;dividend&quot; right away.&nbsp;&nbsp; Maybe an option to cash out? (BTW, I&#8217;ve invested my IRA in renewable energy technology via the &quot;New Alternatives Fund.&quot;) &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-53006</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/#comment-53006</guid>
		<description>Question for James Hansen and CTC:Would it not be advantageous to use dividends to give consumers an equity stake and interest in decarbonization?This could be achieved by investing carbon tax revenue in renewable energy and clean technologies in exchange for equity, and distributing equity shares to the public on an equitable per-capita basis. The shares would yield dividends that increase -- not decrease -- as carbon is phased out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question for James Hansen and CTC:Would it not be advantageous to use dividends to give consumers an equity stake and interest in decarbonization?This could be achieved by investing carbon tax revenue in renewable energy and clean technologies in exchange for equity, and distributing equity shares to the public on an equitable per-capita basis. The shares would yield dividends that increase &#8212; not decrease &#8212; as carbon is phased out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmullins</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-52537</link>
		<dc:creator>tmullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/25/hansen-tells-ways-means-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-needed-to-spur-clean-technology-revolution/#comment-52537</guid>
		<description>Here in Appalachia we just wish they would stop tearing our mountains down.
  &#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Appalachia we just wish they would stop tearing our mountains down.<br />
  &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
