<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Worked for Acid Rain Won’t Work for Climate Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/21/what-worked-for-acid-rain-won%e2%80%99t-work-for-climate-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/21/what-worked-for-acid-rain-won%e2%80%99t-work-for-climate-change/</link>
	<description>Pricing carbon efficiently and equitably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:02:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Handley</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/21/what-worked-for-acid-rain-won%e2%80%99t-work-for-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-52538</link>
		<dc:creator>James Handley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/02/21/what-worked-for-acid-rain-won%e2%80%99t-work-for-climate-change/#comment-52538</guid>
		<description>US Climate Task Force economist Rob Shapiro reached similar conclusions in&#160;&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.climatetaskforce.org/2009/02/markey%E2%80%99s-skewed-comparisons/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Markey&#039;s Skewed Comparisons&lt;/a&gt;&quot;:&#160; &lt;blockquote&gt;
    &quot;Since the technology was already in existence, the trading system was not the cause of this technological advance.&quot;
    &quot;For SO2, it really was a question of creating the price incentives to invest in known technology, which turned out to be even cheaper than expected. With C02, it will be a matter of developing new technologies and bringing them to market.&quot;&#160;
    &quot;Carbon taxes give steady incentives for businesses and households to invest in more energy-efficient and climate-friendly technologies, while also providing funds to spur the development of new carbon-reducing fuels and technologies.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US Climate Task Force economist Rob Shapiro reached similar conclusions in&nbsp;&quot;<a href="http://www.climatetaskforce.org/2009/02/markey%E2%80%99s-skewed-comparisons/" rel="nofollow">Markey&#8217;s Skewed Comparisons</a>&quot;:&nbsp;<br />
<blockquote>
    &quot;Since the technology was already in existence, the trading system was not the cause of this technological advance.&quot;<br />
    &quot;For SO2, it really was a question of creating the price incentives to invest in known technology, which turned out to be even cheaper than expected. With C02, it will be a matter of developing new technologies and bringing them to market.&quot;&nbsp;<br />
    &quot;Carbon taxes give steady incentives for businesses and households to invest in more energy-efficient and climate-friendly technologies, while also providing funds to spur the development of new carbon-reducing fuels and technologies.&quot;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
