<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: At Last, It Begins: Real, Substantive Debate on 2009 Climate Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/11/26/at-last-it-begins-real-substantive-debate-on-2009-climate-legislation-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/11/26/at-last-it-begins-real-substantive-debate-on-2009-climate-legislation-2/</link>
	<description>Pricing carbon efficiently and equitably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:39:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Sundstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/11/26/at-last-it-begins-real-substantive-debate-on-2009-climate-legislation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41704</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Sundstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 21:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/11/26/at-last-it-begins-real-substantive-debate-on-2009-climate-legislation-2/#comment-41704</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great to see people working on serious alternatives to cap-and-trade. 
  It&#039;s seems hard to get people interested. I just introduced a topic of carbon tax-and-dividend in the &lt;em&gt;American Politics&lt;/em&gt; forum on Orkut (Google login req.).
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.orkut.com/Main#CommMsgs.aspx?cmm=5304&amp;tid=5276475839781172165&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.orkut.com/Main#CommMsgs.aspx?cmm=5304&amp;tid=5276475839781172165&lt;/a&gt;
  I was surprised to find almost no serious objection (aside from warming deniers and Libertarians); but also little interest.
  Best of luck to all involved in the briefing, I&#039;ll be watching for reaction and results.
  &#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great to see people working on serious alternatives to cap-and-trade.<br />
  It&#8217;s seems hard to get people interested. I just introduced a topic of carbon tax-and-dividend in the <em>American Politics</em> forum on Orkut (Google login req.).<br />
  <a href="http://www.orkut.com/Main#CommMsgs.aspx?cmm=5304&amp;tid=5276475839781172165" rel="nofollow">http://www.orkut.com/Main#CommMsgs.aspx?cmm=5304&#038;tid=5276475839781172165</a><br />
  I was surprised to find almost no serious objection (aside from warming deniers and Libertarians); but also little interest.<br />
  Best of luck to all involved in the briefing, I&#8217;ll be watching for reaction and results.<br />
  &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/11/26/at-last-it-begins-real-substantive-debate-on-2009-climate-legislation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41626</link>
		<dc:creator>David Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/11/26/at-last-it-begins-real-substantive-debate-on-2009-climate-legislation-2/#comment-41626</guid>
		<description>I was looking for something in the &quot;news&quot; (??)&#160;about the meeting. Nothing I could find. (Didn&#039;t look all that hard, though.) So I read the WSJ opinion essay on the CTC front page. The first line begins, &quot;Liberal interest groups, think tanks, lobbyists, bloggers and other nuisances…&quot; and further along,&#160;the pH of that vitriol&#160;decreases even more! Gee, when I was young I would get my mouth washed out with soap for just saying things like that!&#160;The essay goes on to praise the Carbon Tax as a least-worst way to achieve a worthless end.
  
  As a quality paper, the WSJ has gone so far south they must have gauchos doing the proofreading. Should the CTC link to such venal, spiteful drivel?
  
  I do appreciate the links. Including links to essays expressing points of view that are not necessarily in concordance with the CTC&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking for something in the &quot;news&quot; (??)&nbsp;about the meeting. Nothing I could find. (Didn&#8217;t look all that hard, though.) So I read the WSJ opinion essay on the CTC front page. The first line begins, &quot;Liberal interest groups, think tanks, lobbyists, bloggers and other nuisances…&quot; and further along,&nbsp;the pH of that vitriol&nbsp;decreases even more! Gee, when I was young I would get my mouth washed out with soap for just saying things like that!&nbsp;The essay goes on to praise the Carbon Tax as a least-worst way to achieve a worthless end.</p>
<p>  As a quality paper, the WSJ has gone so far south they must have gauchos doing the proofreading. Should the CTC link to such venal, spiteful drivel?</p>
<p>  I do appreciate the links. Including links to essays expressing points of view that are not necessarily in concordance with the CTC&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ocampo G</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/11/26/at-last-it-begins-real-substantive-debate-on-2009-climate-legislation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41568</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ocampo G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/11/26/at-last-it-begins-real-substantive-debate-on-2009-climate-legislation-2/#comment-41568</guid>
		<description>It is great to see this event all set to go. Blessings on all who have been sparkplugging it, and may it make a great big splash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great to see this event all set to go. Blessings on all who have been sparkplugging it, and may it make a great big splash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

