<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Near-Unanimity for Tax at TV Roundtable on Carbon Pricing</title>
	<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/04/24/near-unanimity-for-tax-at-tv-roundtable-on-carbon-pricing/</link>
	<description>Pricing carbon efficiently and equitably</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Carbon Tax Center &#187; Boxer the Trapper (of Global Warming Deniers)</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/04/24/near-unanimity-for-tax-at-tv-roundtable-on-carbon-pricing/#comment-23011</link>
		<author>Carbon Tax Center &#187; Boxer the Trapper (of Global Warming Deniers)</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 19:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/04/24/near-unanimity-for-tax-at-tv-roundtable-on-carbon-pricing/#comment-23011</guid>
		<description>[...] from left to right agree that the gold standard for effective climate policy is a revenue-neutral carbon tax with dividend. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] from left to right agree that the gold standard for effective climate policy is a revenue-neutral carbon tax with dividend. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Weed</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/04/24/near-unanimity-for-tax-at-tv-roundtable-on-carbon-pricing/#comment-21610</link>
		<author>Al Weed</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/04/24/near-unanimity-for-tax-at-tv-roundtable-on-carbon-pricing/#comment-21610</guid>
		<description>Good comments from James.&#160; In today's tax avoidance environment (even Obama recently used &#34;tax relief&#34; -- the conservatives' framing) maybe we are hurting ourselves by using carbon &#34;tax&#34;.&#160; I have been using &#34;carbon fees&#34;, but have recently started to call them &#34;carbon &lt;em&gt;tipping&lt;/em&gt; fees&#34;.Who can object to users paying for the &#34;waste&#34; they create?&#160; Who can argue that all of us should not be responsible enough to share the cost of dealing with this waste?&#160; Just as ordinary landfill tipping fees encourage recycling and and reuse as a way to reduce solid waste, so would carbon tipping fees lead us to a much lower carbon world.&#160;I fear that cap-and-trade, based on the limited sulfur dioxide model, will lead us into a dead end that will put off for too many years a more forthright solution to the issue.&#160; Al Weed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comments from James.&nbsp; In today&#8217;s tax avoidance environment (even Obama recently used &quot;tax relief&quot; &#8212; the conservatives&#8217; framing) maybe we are hurting ourselves by using carbon &quot;tax&quot;.&nbsp; I have been using &quot;carbon fees&quot;, but have recently started to call them &quot;carbon <em>tipping</em> fees&quot;.Who can object to users paying for the &quot;waste&quot; they create?&nbsp; Who can argue that all of us should not be responsible enough to share the cost of dealing with this waste?&nbsp; Just as ordinary landfill tipping fees encourage recycling and and reuse as a way to reduce solid waste, so would carbon tipping fees lead us to a much lower carbon world.&nbsp;I fear that cap-and-trade, based on the limited sulfur dioxide model, will lead us into a dead end that will put off for too many years a more forthright solution to the issue.&nbsp; Al Weed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/04/24/near-unanimity-for-tax-at-tv-roundtable-on-carbon-pricing/#comment-21460</link>
		<author>David Collins</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2008/04/24/near-unanimity-for-tax-at-tv-roundtable-on-carbon-pricing/#comment-21460</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to Clean Skies TV and CTC! Discussions like this are the kind of action needed. &#34;Carbon tax&#34; is held to be a non-starter, and we cannot expect a serious Presidential candidate to espouse the issue: &#34;We the People&#34; type folks must work at changing the perception. Consider the distortions&#160;in the&#160;flak thrown at Obama for&#160;who he&#160;served on committees with.&#160;Or McCain's recommending a summer vacation for gasoline taxes. Getting a Senator or Representative on board might be possible but is unlikely. Could anybody be featured on Oprah?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to Clean Skies TV and CTC! Discussions like this are the kind of action needed. &quot;Carbon tax&quot; is held to be a non-starter, and we cannot expect a serious Presidential candidate to espouse the issue: &quot;We the People&quot; type folks must work at changing the perception. Consider the distortions&nbsp;in the&nbsp;flak thrown at Obama for&nbsp;who he&nbsp;served on committees with.&nbsp;Or McCain&#8217;s recommending a summer vacation for gasoline taxes. Getting a Senator or Representative on board might be possible but is unlikely. Could anybody be featured on Oprah?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
