Carbon Tax Bill in the Mail
01/24/2008 by Daniel Rosenblum
Carbon Tax Bill in the Mail (Montreal Gazette)
Latest News
White House Moves to Update ‘Social Cost of Carbon’ (NYT)
For Conservatives & Libertarians, Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax Beats Regulations (Ron Bailey, Reason)
Film Presses Case for Nuclear Energy (Andy Revkin, NYT)
Pandora’s Promise: Nuclear Power’s Trek From Too Cheap To Meter To Too Costly To Matter Much (Think Progress)
Conservatives Debate Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax (E&E News)
Baucus: ‘Creeping’ Interest in Carbon Tax, But Camp Says No. (The Hill, blog)
Read these first
Daily Email Updates
Latest News, continued
What to Make of a Plateau in Global Warming? (NYT)
Administration Raises Estimate of “Social Cost of Carbon” (Brad Plumer, WaPo)
Study: Energy Efficiency “Gap” Is Overrated (M.I.T. CEEPR)
IEA Report: World CO2 Emissions Rose 1.4% in 2012 (WaPo)
Congress hates carbon pricing. The rest of the world doesn’t. (Brad Plumer, WaPo Wonkblog)
Koch Bros. On-Line Adverts Target Carbon Tax (Guardian)
B.C.’s carbon tax is driving down emissions (Vancouver Sun)
British Columbia Will Keep Raising CO2 Tax If Neighbors Do (Toronto Metro)
Sen. Lautenberg Challenged Science-Deniers in Tobacco, Booze, Gun, Chemical, Fossil Fuel Industries (The Scientist)
Geoengineering’s False Promise (NYT op-ed)
Well-Designed Energy Taxes Offer Unique Fiscal & Climate Benefits (Nat’l J)
Citizens Climate Lobby Builds Political Momentum For Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax (NY Times)
Blog Archives
Categories
- Blogroll
- Briefly Noted
- Budget
- Cap-and-Trade
- Carbon Tax
- Did you know?
- Editorial
- Equity
- Governmental Bodies
- Graphs
- International
- Krazy Karbon
- Media
- News
- Newsletter
- Offsets
- Politics
- Prices Matter
- Science
- Technology
Monthy Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Video and PowerPoints are now available from
The Wesleyan Conference
November 2010
Watch the 30-minute highlight video
See presentations (video and PPT) by Hansen, McKibben, Ackerman, Barnes, DeChristopher, Reps. Larson, McDermott, Inglis, and others.
oops… there’s the problem.
Comment by socialscientist — January 25, 2008 @ 1:53 pm
Uh, duh… "the polluter pays". Who’s the polluter here: the company that provides the gas, or the consumer that actually uses it? Of course, the consumer. If gas prices didn’t go up, people would have no incentive to use less. Is the gas company supposed to subsidize people’s gas usage? Stupid article, stupid people!
Comment by Yak — January 25, 2008 @ 2:30 pm