<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Snow Won&#8217;t Fall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2007/02/21/when-snow-wont-fall-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2007/02/21/when-snow-wont-fall-2/</link>
	<description>Pricing carbon efficiently and equitably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Arning</title>
		<link>http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2007/02/21/when-snow-wont-fall-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5521</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Arning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbontax.org/newsite/blogarchives/2007/02/21/when-snow-wont-fall-2/#comment-5521</guid>
		<description>&quot;Based on the high price-elasticities for many luxury goods, the tax might be expected to reduce sales of home snowmakers by around a third.&quot;

Just curious - is this estimate based on a single luxury good increasing in price and selling fewer units, or does it consider the many things that might be increasing in price simultaneously under a carbon tax? It seems that the latter case might result in even fewer sales as people need to pay for more pressing purchases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Based on the high price-elasticities for many luxury goods, the tax might be expected to reduce sales of home snowmakers by around a third.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just curious &#8211; is this estimate based on a single luxury good increasing in price and selling fewer units, or does it consider the many things that might be increasing in price simultaneously under a carbon tax? It seems that the latter case might result in even fewer sales as people need to pay for more pressing purchases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

